Vol. 28 (2021)
Research

Economic analysis and law: defense of a methodology

Hugo Alberto Osorio Morales
Universidad Austral de Chile.
Bio

Published 2021-05-05

Keywords

  • Law and economics,
  • Rational choice,
  • Efficiency

How to Cite

Osorio Morales, H. A. (2021). Economic analysis and law: defense of a methodology. Revista De Derecho (Coquimbo. En línea), 28, e3209. https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-9753-2021-0010

Abstract

The methodological and normative foundations of the economic analysis of law are critically addressed, sets forth its main challenges and presents some preliminary assessments. In particular, the model of rational choice, the proposal of value neutrality, the concept of efficiency, and the reasons that could justify the use of efficiency as a social policy guide are discussed in the article. Thus, it’s possible to realize that economic analysis of law provides a new research program with its theoretical framework, methodology and analytical tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bayón Mohíno, J. C. (1989). Causalidad, consecuencialismo y deontologismo. Doxa, (6), 461-500. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA1989.6.24
  2. Blaug, M. (2007). The fundamental theorems of modern welfare economics, historically contemplated. History of political economy, 39(2), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2007-001
  3. Calabresi, G. y Bobbit, P. (1978). Tragic choices. New York, NY: WW Norton .
  4. Calabresi, G. (2016). The future of law and economics: essays in reform and recollection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  5. Chiassoni, P. (2013). El análisis económico del derecho: orígenes, fundamentos y métodos del law & economics en los EE. UU. (F. Morales Luna, Trad.). Lima: Palestra.
  6. Coleman, J. L. (1980). Efficiency, Utility, and Wealth Maximization. Hofstra law review, 8(3), 509-551. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3ekcBub
  7. Cooter, R. D. y Acciarri, H. A. (Dirs.). (2012). Introducción al análisis económico del derecho. Santiago: Civitas.
  8. Davis, J. (2012). The homo economicus conception of the individual: an ontological approach. En U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (Vol. 13, Handbook of the philosophy of science, pp. 459-482). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  9. Dworkin, R. M. (1980). Is wealth a value?. The journal of legal studies, 9(2), 191-226. https://doi.org/10.1086/467636
  10. Dworkin, R. M. (2007). La justicia con toga (M. Iglesias Vila e Í. Ortiz de Urbina Gimeno, Trads.). Madrid: Marcial Pons.
  11. Gneezy, U. y Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The journal of legal studies, 29(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1086/468061
  12. Hausman, D., McPherson, M., y Santz, D. (2017). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy (3a ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316663011
  13. Heukelom, F. (2014). Behavioral economics: a history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hicks, J. R. (1939). The foundations of welfare economics. The economic journal, 49(196), 696-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2225023
  15. Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. The economic journal, 49(195), 549-552. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224835
  16. Kennedy, D. (1982). Distributive and paternalist motives in contract and tort law. Maryland law review, 41(4), 563-658. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2QcNfGG
  17. Leiter, B. (2012). In praise of realism (and against ´nonsense´ jurisprudence). Georgetown law journal, 100(3), 865-893. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3gsBhU2
  18. Leiter, B. (2013). Legal realism, old and new. Valparaiso law review, 47(4), 67-89. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3vbmt0b
  19. Letelier Wartenberg, R. (2016). Análisis Económico del Derecho Administrativo (Proyecto Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico Regular N° 1161037). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2PNsuRs
  20. MacCormick, N. (2016). Retórica y Estado de derecho: una teoría del razonamiento jurídico (J. Á. Gascón Salvado, Trad.). Lima: Palestra.
  21. Mercuro, N. y Medema, S. (2006). Economics and the law: from Posner to postmodernism and beyond (2a ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  22. Núñez Vaquero, Á. (2017). Teorías normativas de la ciencia y la dogmática jurídicas. Lima: Palestra.
  23. Nussbaum, M. (1997). Flawed foundations: the philosophical critique of (a particular type of) economics. University of Chicago Law Review, 64(4), 1197-1214. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tATNx2
  24. Platón. (2014). Fedón (Carlos García Gual, Trad.). Madrid: Gredos.
  25. Posner, R. A. (1983). The economics of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  26. Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law (9a ed.). New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.
  27. Posner, R. A. (2015). Norms and values in the economic approach to law. En A. N. Hatzis y N. Mercuro, Law and economics: philosophical issues and fundamental questions (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: Routledge.
  28. Reiss, J. (2013). Philosophy of economics: a contemporary introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
  29. Rosen, H. y Gayer, T. (2010). Public finance (9a ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  30. Sandel, M. J. (2013). Lo que el dinero no puede comprar: los límites morales del mercado (J. Chamorro Mielke, Trad.). Random House Mondadori, Barcelona.
  31. Sen, A. K. (1989). Sobre ética y economía (Á. Conde, Trad.). Madrid: Alianza.
  32. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  33. Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., Weinstein, M. C., y Graham, J. D. (1995). Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk analysis, 15(3), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x
  34. Thaler, R. (2015). Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
  35. Tucídides. (2014). Historia de la guerra del Peloponeso (3a ed.) (A. Guzmán Guerra, Trad.). Madrid: Alianza.